Regulatory News

Every year, thousands of financial institutions rush to meet the March 1 HMDA filing deadline—and every year, edit check errors slow them down. These validation failures can range from simple data entry mistakes to complex logic conflicts that require careful analysis to resolve. After helping institutions file HMDA data for nearly four decades, we've seen the same errors appear again and again. Here's how to identify and fix the 10 most common HMDA edit check errors before they delay your submission. Understanding HMDA Edit Check Types Before diving into specific errors, it's important to understand the three types of HMDA edit checks: Syntax Edits: Verify data format and structure. These must be corrected before submission. Validity Edits: Confirm values fall within acceptable…

Continue Reading ⇢

Status note, updated 18 August 2026. This checklist was written for the 2025 data / March 2026 filing cycle, and that cycle has closed — the dates below are kept as a worked example rather than as upcoming deadlines. The eight preparation steps themselves do not change from year to year, so the checklist is still the one to work through. For the 2026 data year, the filing deadline is 1 March 2027, which falls on a Monday and so needs no adjustment. The March 2, 2026 deadline for submitting your 2025 HMDA data is a Monday, and that is the only reason it is not March 1: the usual date falls on a Sunday this year. Whether this is your first filing or your thirtieth, working through a structured preparation process is what keeps the last week of February from turning into a…

Continue Reading ⇢

Why Redlining Risk Should Continue to Be a Focus During the Next Administration Guest analysis. This article was written by Richard Horn of Garris Horn LLP and first published on 20 January 2025. The first-person voice throughout is the author’s, not RATA’s. Primary sources for the two settlements it discusses are the CFPB enforcement action against Draper & Kramer Mortgage Corporation (17 January 2025) and the Justice Department’s settlement with The Mortgage Firm, Inc. (7 January 2025), with the case documents on the DOJ’s United States v. The Mortgage Firm page (S.D. Fla.). Facts from the CFPB's 17 January 2025 enforcement action and the Justice Department's 7 January 2025 and 10 October 2024 announcements, as cited in this article. …

Continue Reading ⇢

Settlement is the first government resolution involving illegal discrimination by a nonbank mortgage lender Washington, D.C. – Today, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) took action to end Trident Mortgage Company's intentional discrimination against families living in majority-minority neighborhoods in the greater Philadelphia area. The figures and allegations below are drawn from the CFPB enforcement action against Trident Mortgage Company, LP and the accompanying consent order, filed 27 July 2022 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania as case No. 2:22-cv-02936, together with the Justice Department announcement of the same date. The CFPB and DOJ allege Trident redlined majority-minority neighborhoods…

Continue Reading ⇢

Trustmark to Pay $5 Million Penalty and $3.85 Million to Increase Mortgage Credit Access in Memphis Neighborhoods Impacted by Redlining WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), in cooperation with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), took action today to put an end to alleged redlining by Trustmark National Bank.  The CFPB and DOJ allege that Trustmark discriminated against Black and Hispanic neighborhoods by deliberately not marketing, offering, or originating home loans to consumers in majority-Black and Hispanic neighborhoods in the Memphis metropolitan area. The allegations and figures below come from the CFPB announcement of 22 October 2021 and the consent order in United States v. Trustmark…

Continue Reading ⇢

• Per Page: 51050All
• «12345678»All
• Page #: 12345678