Regulatory News

CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU ANNOUNCES SETTLEMENT WITH WASHINGTON FEDERAL BANK, N.A. FOR FLAWED MORTGAGE-LOAN DATA REPORTING

CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU ANNOUNCES SETTLEMENT WITH WASHINGTON FEDERAL BANK, N.A. FOR FLAWED MORTGAGE-LOAN DATA REPORTING

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (Bureau) settled with Washington Federal Bank, N.A., a federally insured national bank, to address the Bureau's finding that it reported inaccurate Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data about its mortgage transactions for 2016 and 2017.  Inaccurate HMDA data can make it difficult for the public and regulators to discover and stop discrimination in home mortgage lending or for public officials and lenders to tell whether a community's credit needs are being met.  The settlement requires Washington Federal to pay a $200,000 civil money penalty and develop and implement an effective compliance-management system to prevent future violations.

The Bureau found that Washington Federal, headquartered in Seattle, Washington, violated HMDA, its implementing regulation, Regulation C, and the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (CFPA) by failing to report accurate data about its mortgage-loan applications to the Bureau.  Washington Federal is currently subject to a 2013 consent order with the Bureau based on the Bureau's previous findings that Washington Federal violated HMDA and Regulation C.  

Washington Federal reported HMDA data for over 7,000 mortgage applications in each of 2016 and 2017.  The Bureau found that these data included significant errors, with some samples having error rates as high as 40%.  The Bureau found that the errors in Washington Federal's 2016 HMDA data were caused by a lack of appropriate staff, insufficient staff training, and ineffective quality control, and that the errors in its 2017 HMDA data were directly related to weaknesses in Washington Federal's compliance-management system.  Weaknesses were specifically found in the areas of board and management oversight, monitoring, and policies and procedures. These significant errors in reported mortgage-application data violated Regulation C and HMDA.  These violations also constituted violations of the CFPA.

The consent order is available at: https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_washington-federal-na_consent-order_2020-10.pdf

Search

 

Recent Posts

 

Archives

 

Categories

 

RATA News

View All ⇢

Regulatory News

View All ⇢

Fair Lending

View All ⇢

SBL 1071

View All ⇢

White Papers & Reports

View All ⇢

Tags

 

 RSS Feed

See Comply HMDA/CRA in Action

Schedule a free online demonstration to discover what Comply HMDA/CRA can do for your institution.

Schedule Your Free Demo Have Questions? Contact Us

What happens next

  • 40 minutes, screen-shared. A live walkthrough on RATA sample data, driven by your questions rather than a script.
  • A specialist, not a relay. The person on the call knows both the software and the regulations behind it.
  • Mid-cycle is normal. Implementation and historical conversion are handled for you, typically inside a day.
Or see a specific module in action: