Justice Department Reaches Settlement Agreement With First United Bank Over Allegations of Discrimination on the Basis of National Origin

The Justice Department announced today that First United Bank, of Dimmitt, Texas, will maintain uniform pricing policies, conduct employee training and pay $140,000 as part of a settlement to resolve allegations that it engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination on the basis of national origin.
| Institution | Regulator(s) | Violation | Penalty | Period covered | HMDA/fair-lending data field involved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First United Bank | Justice Department (Civil Rights Division); referred by the FDIC | Pattern or practice of discrimination on the basis of national origin — charging higher prices on unsecured consumer loans made to Hispanic borrowers, in violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) | $140,000 total, to compensate hundreds of victims of discrimination | — | National origin discrimination in loan pricing (unsecured consumer loans) |
The settlement, which is subject to court approval, was filed in conjunction with the Justice Department's complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The complaint alleges that First United Bank charged higher prices on unsecured consumer loans made to Hispanic borrowers in violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA).
"The Civil Rights Division is committed to ensuring that lenders price all types of loans based on appropriate credit factors and not based on prohibited factors such as national origin," said Acting Assistant Attorney General Vanita Gupta for the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division. "We commend First United Bank for implementing a system of loan pricing that provides objective guidance to the bank's employees."
The lawsuit originated from a referral by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to the Civil Rights Division. First United Bank is a member of the FDIC.
Under the settlement, First United Bank will pay a total of $140,000 to compensate hundreds of victims of discrimination, monitor its loans for potential disparities based on national origin and provide equal credit opportunity training to its employees. First United Bank will also maintain its revised pricing policies to ensure that the price charged for its loans is set in a non-discriminatory manner consistent with the requirements of ECOA. The agreement also prohibits the bank from discriminating on the basis of national origin in any aspect of a credit transaction.
"This district is committed to ensuring banks and other lending institutions do not discriminate against borrowers on the basis of national origin," said Acting U.S. Attorney John Parker for the Northern District of Texas. "I join the Acting Assistant Attorney General in recognizing First United Bank's cooperation in accomplishing this settlement that will compensate hundreds of victims of this discrimination."
The Justice Department's enforcement of fair lending laws is conducted by the Fair Lending Unit of the Housing and Civil Enforcement Section in the Civil Rights Division. Since the Fair Lending Unit was established in February 2010, it has filed or resolved 36 lending matters under the Fair Housing Act, ECOA and the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. The settlements in these matters provide for over $1.2 billion in monetary relief for impacted communities and individual borrowers. The Attorney General's annual reports to Congress subject to ECOA highlight the department's accomplishments in fair lending and are available at www.justice.gov/crt/publication.
The Civil Rights Division and the FDIC are members of the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force. President Obama established the interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to wage an aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. The task force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes. For more information on the task force, visit www.StopFraud.gov.
A copy of the complaint and proposed order, as well as additional information about fair lending enforcement by the Justice Department, can be obtained from the Justice Department website at www.justice.gov/fairhousing.
What this means for your fair lending review
The DOJ's complaint alleged that First United Bank charged higher prices on unsecured consumer loans made to Hispanic borrowers. Those loans never reach an HMDA LAR, and Regulation B generally bars asking for ethnicity on them, so routine reports will not show a gap like this.
To test your consumer book, estimate each borrower's ethnicity with a surname and geography proxy (BISG), then regress the rate charged on the factors your pricing policy says should drive it: credit score, debt-to-income, term and amount. A gap that survives those controls is what an examiner will ask about. The settlement also required monitoring for national-origin disparities, so rerun the test after any pricing change to confirm the gap closed. Comply Fair Lending runs the same BISG proxy and pricing regression on your HMDA data, and the steps carry over to a consumer loan file.
For where a pricing test sits in a full program, see our step-by-step fair lending self-assessment.
Source: US Department of Justice
- 2025 Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) Small Business, Small Farm and Community Development Lending Data: What Changed and What to Do Next
- How to Choose Section 1071 Software: What to Test Before Your First Filing
- How to Benchmark Your CRA and HMDA Lending Against Peer Data
- HMDA vs CRA vs Section 1071: What Each Rule Collects and Who Has to File
- Fair Lending Regression Analysis: What It Controls For and How to Explain a Pricing Disparity
- November 2026
- October 2026
- September 2026
- August 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- 2025
- 2022
- 2021
- 2020
- 2017
- 2026 HMDA Data: Your Filing Checklist for the March 1, 2027 Deadline
- HMDA Plus: What It Actually Changed in the LAR Workflow
- How to Fix the 10 Most Common HMDA Edit Check Errors
- How to Evaluate Fair Lending and CRA Software: What to Test Before You Sign
- What a Fair Lending Exam Actually Asks For
- Fair Servicing: What Examiners Test in Servicing Data, and How to Test It First
- What Actually Counts as a Small Business Loan Under Section 1071
- Section 1071 in 2026: What Lenders Need to Know About Small Business Lending Data




