CFPB
CFPB and DOJ Settle Redlining Claims Against Non-Depository Mortgage Companies Before Change in Administration
Why Redlining Risk Should Continue to Be a Focus During the Next Administration Guest analysis. This article was written by Richard Horn of Garris Horn LLP and first published on 20 January 2025. The first-person voice throughout is the author’s, not RATA’s. Primary sources for the two settlements it discusses are the CFPB enforcement action against Draper & Kramer Mortgage Corporation (17 January 2025) and the Justice Department’s settlement with The Mortgage Firm, Inc. (7 January 2025), with the case documents on the DOJ’s United States v. The Mortgage Firm page (S.D. Fla.). Facts from the CFPB's 17 January 2025 enforcement action and the Justice Department's 7 January 2025 and 10 October 2024 announcements, as cited in this article. …
Search
Recent Posts
- What Actually Counts as a Small Business Loan Under Section 1071
- The ComplyBI Era Has Arrived
- Fair Lending Self-Assessment: A Step-by-Step Guide for 2026
- How to Fix the 10 Most Common HMDA Edit Check Errors
- Section 1071 in 2026: What Lenders Need to Know About Small Business Lending Data
Archives
Categories
RATA News
Regulatory News
- How to Fix the 10 Most Common HMDA Edit Check Errors
- 2025 HMDA Filing: Your Complete Preparation Checklist for March 2
- CFPB and DOJ Settle Redlining Claims Against Non-Depository Mortgage Companies Before Change in Administration
Fair Lending
- Fair Lending Self-Assessment: A Step-by-Step Guide for 2026
- CFPB takes action against Nationstar Mortgage for flawed mortgage loan reporting
- CFPB Takes Action Against Fifth Third Bank for Auto-Lending Discrimination and Illegal Credit Card Practices
SBL 1071
- What Actually Counts as a Small Business Loan Under Section 1071
- Section 1071 in 2026: What Lenders Need to Know About Small Business Lending Data
White Papers & Reports
Tags
