Justice Department Reaches Settlement with Fort Davis State Bank to Resolve Allegations of Lending Discrimination

The Justice Department announced today that Fort Davis State Bank, based in Fort Davis, Texas, will implement uniform pricing policies, conduct employee training and pay $159,000 as part of a settlement to resolve allegations that it engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination on the basis of national origin.
| Institution | Regulator(s) | Violation | Penalty | Period covered | HMDA/fair-lending data field involved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fort Davis State Bank | Justice Department (Civil Rights Division); referred by the FDIC | Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) — pattern or practice of pricing discrimination on the basis of national origin, charging higher prices for unsecured consumer loans to Hispanic borrowers than to similarly qualified non-Hispanic borrowers | $159,000 | — | Loan pricing / interest rate discretion on unsecured consumer loans |
The settlement, which is subject to court approval, was filed in conjunction with the department's complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. The complaint alleges that Fort Davis State Bank violated the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) by charging higher prices for unsecured consumer loans to Hispanic borrowers than to similarly qualified non-Hispanic borrowers.
Fort Davis State Bank is a community bank with three branches that for many years has been a significant presence in the local Hispanic community.
"This settlement ensures that Hispanic borrowers who paid more for their loans will be properly compensated," said Acting Assistant Attorney General Jocelyn Samuels for the department's Civil Rights Division. "We commend Fort Davis State Bank's commitment to meeting the special lending needs of all individuals within its community on an equal basis and to working cooperatively with the Justice Department in reaching an appropriate resolution of this case."
The lawsuit originated from a 2011 referral to the Department by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Fort Davis State Bank is regulated by the FDIC.
The proceeds of the settlement will be used to compensate Hispanic victims of Fort Davis State Bank's alleged discrimination. Under the proposed settlement, a list of individual victims will be identified by the United States and receive notification of eligibility from the bank, and the department will monitor the compensation process.
Prior to the settlement, Fort Davis State Bank implemented uniform pricing policies that substantially reduced the discretion of its loan officers to vary a loan's interest rate from the price it set based on borrower's objective credit-related factors. Today's settlement requires Fort Davis State Bank to keep its improved policies in place for at least the next three years, as well as to continue to monitor its lending for signs of discrimination and provide monitoring reports to the United States.
The department's enforcement of fair lending laws is conducted by the Fair Lending Unit of the Housing and Civil Enforcement Section in the Civil Rights Division. Since the Fair Lending Unit was established in February 2010, it has filed or resolved 29 lending matters under the Fair Housing Act, ECOA and the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. The settlements in these matters provide for nearly $700 million in monetary relief for impacted communities and individual borrowers. The Attorney General's annual reports to Congress subject to ECOA highlight the department's accomplishments in fair lending and are available at www.justice.gov/crt/publications.
The Civil Rights Division and the FDIC are members of the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force. President Obama established the interagency task force to wage an aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. The task force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, along with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes. For more information on the task force, visit www.StopFraud.gov.
A copy of the complaint and proposed order, as well as additional information about fair lending enforcement by the Justice Department, can be obtained from the Justice Department website at www.justice.gov/fairhousing.
What this means for your fair lending review
Fort Davis State Bank, in the DOJ's words, had long been "a significant presence in the local Hispanic community." The complaint alleged that it charged Hispanic borrowers more for unsecured consumer loans than similarly qualified non-Hispanic borrowers. The release credits the bank with adopting uniform pricing that "substantially reduced the discretion of its loan officers to vary a loan's interest rate" from the price set by the borrower's credit factors.
Measure that discretion directly. For each loan, take the rate charged minus the rate your pricing policy would have produced. Total the difference by loan officer and by branch, then map it by census tract over tract demographics to see whether the larger differences cluster where Hispanic residents live. Tract share is not borrower ethnicity, so a cluster tells you which files to pull. Comply Mapping shades tracts by demographics and overlays your lending.
See how a full fair lending self-assessment is structured.
Source: US Department of Justice
- 2025 Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) Small Business, Small Farm and Community Development Lending Data: What Changed and What to Do Next
- How to Choose Section 1071 Software: What to Test Before Your First Filing
- How to Benchmark Your CRA and HMDA Lending Against Peer Data
- HMDA vs CRA vs Section 1071: What Each Rule Collects and Who Has to File
- Fair Lending Regression Analysis: What It Controls For and How to Explain a Pricing Disparity
- November 2026
- October 2026
- September 2026
- August 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- 2025
- 2022
- 2021
- 2020
- 2017
- 2026 HMDA Data: Your Filing Checklist for the March 1, 2027 Deadline
- HMDA Plus: What It Actually Changed in the LAR Workflow
- How to Fix the 10 Most Common HMDA Edit Check Errors
- How to Evaluate Fair Lending and CRA Software: What to Test Before You Sign
- What a Fair Lending Exam Actually Asks For
- Fair Servicing: What Examiners Test in Servicing Data, and How to Test It First
- What Actually Counts as a Small Business Loan Under Section 1071
- Section 1071 in 2026: What Lenders Need to Know About Small Business Lending Data




